Allowing (And Accepting) Students' Choices Is Hard

Posted on by Bud Hunt

One of the really difficult things about giving students meaningful choices is that they will sometimes make horrible ones.  This isn’t a school problem, so much, as it is a democracy problem.  And I’ve met plenty of people who don’t feel that all adults are able to make good choices, either.

People don’t always make the choices that we want them to.  But honoring freedom and liberty means that we allow them to make bad choices.  And we don’t stop folks from making choices just because we wish they would’ve made different ones.

I was reminded of this today as I was listening to a teacher lamenting the fact that some of his students sometimes don’t complete their schoolwork.

 In class or at home.  They just choose not to do the work.  It’s a struggle to figure out sometimes when to acknowledge and when to struggle with doing something about that.

There’s a school of thought in education that suggests we cannot allow a student to make the choice to not do things, to choose to fail.  This gets expressed in plenty of ways, but one of my least favorite of those is the ways that lock students into situations (lessons, projects, readings, or even devices) over which they have no meaningful control.

I don’t find myself aligned with that school of thought so much.  Real choices mean real consequences – but also they mean that we can’t undo the deal of every bad choice a student <ahem> chooses to make.

I noticed tonight that an Alfie Kohn essay I fawned over when I read it in English Journal four years ago was recently re-posted on the Answer Sheet.  The whole thing is worth your time (and related to the above), but here’s a choice bit:

The sad irony is that as children grow older and become more capable of making decisions, they’re given less opportunity to do so in schools.  In some respects, teenagers actually have less to say about their learning – and about the particulars of how they’ll spend their time in school each day — than do kindergarteners.  Thus, the average American high school is excellent preparation for adult life. . . assuming that one lives in a totalitarian society.

When parents ask, “What did you do in school today?”, kids often respond, “Nothing.”  Howard Gardner pointed out that they’re probably right, because “typically school is done to students.”[]  This sort of enforced passivity is particularly characteristic of classrooms where students are excluded from any role in shaping the curriculum, where they’re on the receiving end of lectures and questions, assignments and assessments.  One result is a conspicuous absence of critical, creative thinking – something that (irony alert!) the most controlling teachers are likely to blame on the students themselves, who are said to be irresponsible, unmotivated, apathetic, immature, and so on.  But the fact is that kids learn to make good decisions by making decisions, not by following directions.

Conversely, students who have almost nothing to say about what happens in class are more likely to act out, tune out, burn out, or simply drop out.  Again, it takes some courage to face the fact that these responses are related to what we’re doing, or not doing.  And the same is true of my larger point in this essay:  A lack of opportunity to make decisions may well manifest itself in a lack of interest in reading and writing.  Were that our goal, our single best strategy might be to run a traditional teacher-centered, teacher–directed classroom.

If you only let ((This notion of permission is tricky, too, isn’t it? Are we really the folks who control whether or not choice can occur in our classrooms?  I’m not so sure about that.)) students make choices where the stakes are irrelevant and the options are, too, then you’re not really in the choice business, are you?

52 thoughts on “Allowing (And Accepting) Students' Choices Is Hard”

  1. Jamey Boelhower says:
    December 11, 2014 at 9:39 am

    I agree with your insight and the Alfie Kohn essay segments you shared. One deeper idea that came to mind as I read the post was the idea of trust… Without creating a blog post in the comments, there seems at all levels of education a lack of trust in education. From standards to bathroom passes, we have a system that showcases control over trust as individuals. Thanks for sharing your views.

    Reply
  2. Stevan Kalmon says:
    December 12, 2014 at 8:40 am

    A couple of months ago I was working with a group of teachers on a questioning protocol for initiating/shaping inquiry. One enthusiastically skeptical high school science teacher had this concern: “How can I make sure that the students ask the questions I want them to?” I get it; she has mandated content to “cover.” But…

    I agree with Jamey Boelhower that what we have here is a massive failure to trust. As Bud and Alfie point out, it’s not about trust in the narrow sense that we are confident kids (and teachers) will do what we want them to do, or even that they’ll do The Right Thing. It’s a much broader trust that, over time, good things will emerge — even when, indeed especially when mistakes get made.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Published by Bud Hunt