The Week in Tweets for 2012-01-16

• Back in the real world. Big week ahead. #
• Showing Twitter to some of our Student Services staff in St. Vrain this morning. #
• @irasocol Thank you kindly.
  online canadian pharmacy levitra

  in reply to irasocol #

• @deanohaak Cool. Keep us posted. in reply to deanohaak #
• @librarybecky They did indeed. Been in place largely as written for the last year and a half. Let me know if I can help. in reply to librarybecky #
• Yeah. This is pretty good. http://t.co/swwL7gMA #
• @librarybecky That’s a good question. I’ll confirm with my CIO, but it’s public document. Reference would be good. in reply to librarybecky #
• @amberkarnes Isolation. Turn off the things that ping at you and find a quiet place. Set small goals. in reply to amberkarnes #
• Friends over. They’re making kielbasa and blondies. Sweet. #
• @milobo @mwacker I didn’t know they were playing Bama. Divided. in reply to milobo #
• Staring failure in the face. Thinking I’m going to learn lots in the next week or two. #
• @jonbecker Hard to face. But good to do. in reply to jonbecker #
• Master of Arts. Or the universe. Either way, this BattleCat’s mine. Thanks, @mrchase http://t.co/mmOMkAQH #
• Looking forward to next Tuesday’s visit with @chemicalsams to talk flipped classrooms. See you there? http://t.co/VzU6tOga #
• @MrChase I may, in fact, have the power, but only because of folks like you. Thanks. in reply to MrChase #
• @librarybecky CIO says no permission needed. Rock on. in reply to librarybecky #
• If you’re going to argue for “integrating technology,” I’m going to stop you right there and ask you to pick a different phrase. #
• Don’t tell me you want to “integrate technology.” Tell me what you actually want to do. #
• @injenuity Because I’d rather know the actual objective. in reply to injenuity #
• @ehelfant Must we assess that? in reply to ehelfant #
• @DataDiva @ehelfant The goal of *any* pre-assessment should be to determine what folks already know – why the need to specify the where? in reply to DataDiva #
• @ehelfant Certainly. I just wonder, when we start talking about assessment, if folks want to manage the in-between times, too. in reply to ehelfant #
• @librarybecky I believe you’re looking for EHC and EHC-R. Let me know if I can be of more assistance. http://t.co/j9AB5Xyj in reply to librarybecky #
• @librarybecky Certainly. Would love to see what you come up with. in reply to librarybecky #
• Hmm. Possible Chromebook deployment in the near future. So that happened. #
• @kylepace Yep. Nothing happens in a vacuum. in reply to kylepace #
• @PaulWHankins @kylepace Not to be too picky, but I believe Trix are compounds. And delicious. in reply to PaulWHankins #
• @PaulWHankins @kylepace I like my Dyson, too. No ball, though. in reply to PaulWHankins #
• Read and experience great stuff. Make great stuff, too. Take turns with both. #edchat #
• Oh, yeah. And argue about what counts as “great.” That part’s important, too. #edchat #
• @KentManning Why? in reply to KentManning #
• Best grilled cheese ever. Soon. http://t.co/XTINYGZt #
• @DanAgins Nope. Those’re for decoration. in reply to DanAgins #
• @stephenksu I’m an instructional technology coordinator for a k-12 district. Previously a high school language arts teacher. in reply to stephenksu #
• @paulrwood It’s a bit geeky, but I like OpenDNS. in reply to paulrwood #
• @Deacs84 I had a similar issue and switched to two factor authentication. Love the extra security. in reply to Deacs84 #
• @billbass It’s true. in reply to billbass #
• Sitting in on the kickoff of our third Digital Administrator Collaborative cohort. #
• @dmlComp How’s the Teacher Mastery stage 1 review going? #
• I’m concerned that #DLDay is a sales promotion. And not necessarily a good one. #
• @jorech Sometimes, teachers ARE authentic audiences. in reply to jorech #
• @sjciske That’s exactly the right question. in reply to sjciske #
• Pleased to have a piece on tech & ed in this month’s centennial issue of _EJ_ w/ @hickstro @skajder and @carl_young. http://t.co/f2KivoO2 #
• St. Vrain staff – my course on Internet Safety has plenty of seats. Starts next week. Sign up soon. http://t.co/3ik2mthU #
• @dmlComp Looking forward to that. in reply to dmlComp #
• DML Teacher Badges winners announced. (Missed again. I’ll post my application later.) http://t.co/5OeKmHuV #
• @msstewart Thanks. I keep missing, I guess. in reply to msstewart #
• And now off to a DLC meeting. Talking about data analysis in our teacher research tonight. Hard. Good. Important. #
• @Deacs84 Will do. in reply to Deacs84 #
• @msstewart @injenuity I’m biased, but it is a sweet event. Long sessions and activity minded. in reply to msstewart #
• @injenuity @msstewart Sweet. Hope to see you there. in reply to injenuity #
• @injenuity @timlauer Me, too. in reply to injenuity #
• @jonbecker @JaneBozarth @ddraper Link? #extralazyweb in reply to jonbecker #
• Having difficulty showing the power of critical inquiry of one’s practice. #frustrated #
• @globalgypsygirl Qualitatively. Quantitatively. At all. in reply to globalgypsygirl #
• @globalgypsygirl More here. http://t.co/XkqjoVq3 in reply to globalgypsygirl #
• @globalgypsygirl Ok. http://t.co/7rFigcPD in reply to globalgypsygirl #
• Man. @donttrythis is in town, but I had to work. Enjoy northern Colorado and come back soon. #
• @mwacker A bit vague. Would a membership organization for that definition? in reply to mwacker #
• You’re welcome to listen in as DLC teachers talk about their teacher research work. http://t.co/1Hint91C #
• Alison’s hoping that, through her research, she’ll learn more about how to evaluate apps for preschool. Good thing to wonder about. #
• Now up – Heritage MS math teachers talking about math vocabulary acquisition – http://t.co/1Hint91C (Sign in as a guest to join us.) #
• Book club tonight. We read this. http://t.co/MutFGPVv #
• Football’s not important. Tim Tebow’s example likely is.http://t.co/CapU9rcW #
• @amichetti @courosa That’s not a design flaw. It’s a design strength. in reply to amichetti #
• @SenBennetCO Please do not vote for SOPA. It’s bad for your state and the rest of the nation. #
• @ehoefler I did. Could’ve been fifty pages shorter, but a good read. in reply to ehoefler #
• Helping a friend move today. Then hoping to have a few minutes to write. #
• Online has potential. http://t.co/olEG9nt9 #
• Uh. Onlive. Not online. Well, it IS online, but it’s Onlive. Not online. ‘cept it is. desktop.onlive.com/?utm_content=u… #
• “Priming is everything.” Yeah. It’s not just skills. It’s skills and knowledge. http://t.co/FBCVHZTH #
• I don’t like computer grading of writing. But I do like students writing more. Tricky issue. http://t.co/y3xlzVVu #
• @pammoran Agree with you. But I’m seeing some of this automation of feedback result in students writing more. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran Vague stuff. But the teacher is freed from mundane tasks and has more time for conferencing. in reply to pammoran #
• @trescolumnae I’ve always argued for more writing. Read or not. in reply to trescolumnae #
• @pammoran I’ve been observing a teacher using a program in a pilot. I’ve got to ultimately approve the software. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran Initially, I was against the pilot. Teacher, who I respect and trust, said it would be helpful. She’s convincing me. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran I share your concern. Without a wicked attentive teacher, not so great. Possibly harmful. But with powerful teacher? in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran Exactly. But many writing teachers don’t understand how language works now. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran I need to write about it. Give me a day or two. Review/evaluation meeting next week and I want to be prepared. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran We English teachers can play both parts. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran There’s some good stuff on machine-assisted grading and writing in Digital Is in the meantime. in reply to pammoran #
• @pammoran Yeah. I can’t say I’m in love with Turn It In. Assumption of guilt bugs me. But I have see folks use it that way. in reply to pammoran #
• @RSaints @pammoran Possibly. Results in “more.”. Not always “better.” in reply to RSaints #
• @JenGrahamWright @pammoran I don’t mind evaluation. But I don’t think we need to evaluate everything a child writes. in reply to JenGrahamWright #
• @JenGrahamWright @pammoran Writing and evaluation are subjective. But I can’t say there’s not clear guidance from research. in reply to JenGrahamWright #
• @JenGrahamWright @pammoran Choice and authenticity and developing writing and critical reading habits. That’s all solid. in reply to JenGrahamWright #
• @JenGrahamWright @pammoran No. But being clear about what you’re looking for helps. in reply to JenGrahamWright #
• @pammoran @JenGrahamWright Saved for later review. Thanks! in reply to pammoran #
• Finished the moving help. Now it’s grilling time. #
• @melaniemcbride @hrheingold And how have we learned that out of folks, institutionally speaking? Struggling with that in some of my work. in reply to melaniemcbride #
• @melaniemcbride I like that question very much. in reply to melaniemcbride #
• Here. http://t.co/D9AjK2t0 #

Powered by Twitter Tools