This post lived in the depths of my drafts folder. I brought it out tonight because it seemed the right time.
Too often lately, I’ve read statements from teachers that sound something like this: “We have to give students voice” or “We have to give our students control over their learning.”
Sure. Students should have voice. And control. And agency. And plenty of things.
But, well, a student’s voice just isn’t mine to give.
By that, I mean that there’s a big problem with “giving somebody” their voice. As a teacher, I can’t give you much of anything that you don’t already have. Nourish it? Cultivate it? Help develop or refine it? Sure.
But give? No. Because that would mean that someone took it away in the first place. And that’s not okay. Further – that would assume that such a thing was mine to take.
And any time we assume that we must give our students those things, or that teachers, too, must be given those things, we make it that much more difficult for the exchange to happen. We get the entire power dynamic backwards when we are handing out voices. Or power. Or control. Human beings have those things, anyway. With or without our permission. We would do well to remember that in the classroom. And plenty of other places.
Teachers, and students, have voices. And agency. It’s up to them, to all of us, to use those things in the service of what’s important1.
Don’t work to “give” students voices. Help them find the ones they already have.
- And, yeah. You’ve got to decide what counts as “important,” too. No free lunches here. [↩]